Hong Kong Ordinances
[Index]
[Table]
[Search]
[Notes]
[Noteup]
[Previous]
[Next]
[Download (Current & Past)]
[Download (Current only)]
[繁體中文]
[Help]
OZONE LAYER PROTECTION ORDINANCE - SECT 4A
Application to air transhipment cargo
(1) Section 4 does not apply in relation to a scheduled substance that is
air transhipment cargo; but if at any time between its being brought into and
taken out of Hong Kong such scheduled substance is removed from the
cargo transhipment area of Hong Kong International Airport then, for the
purposes of section 4-
(a) the scheduled substance is deemed to be imported at the time of such
removal; and
(b) the person who brought the scheduled substance, or caused it to be
brought, into Hong Kong as air transhipment cargo is deemed to be the
person who imports the scheduled substance at the time of its removal,
and, except to that extent, that section has effect as if this
subsection had not been enacted.
(2) (a) For the purpose of the issue of a licence under section 6 for the
import of a scheduled substance, the import of a scheduled substance that is
air transhipment cargo does not take place unless and until the
scheduled substance is removed from the cargo
transhipment area of Hong Kong International Airport other than for the
purpose of its being taken out of Hong Kong by air.
(b) Nothing in this section precludes the issue of a licence under
section 6 for the export of a scheduled substance that is
air transhipment cargo only because the scheduled substance has been
removed from the cargo
transhipment area of Hong Kong International Airport.
(3) In proceedings against a person for an offence under section 4, being
proceedings-
(a) in relation to the import or export of a scheduled substance that is
air transhipment cargo; and
(b) in which it is necessary for the prosecution to prove that, at any
time between its being brought into and taken out of Hong Kong, the
scheduled substance was removed from the
cargo transhipment area of Hong Kong International Airport, it is a
defence for the person to show that he took all reasonable steps and
exercised reasonable diligence to avoid such removal occurring or that
he reasonably believed that such removal had not occurred, as the case
may be.
(4) Where in any proceedings the defence provided by subsection (3) involves
an allegation that the commission of the offence was due to-
(a) the act or default of another person; or
(b) reliance on information given by another person, the defendant is not,
without the leave of the court, entitled to rely on the defence
unless, not less than 10 days before the hearing of the proceedings,
he has served a notice in writing on the prosecutor giving all
particulars of-
(i) the person who committed the act or default or gave the
information; and
(ii) the act, default or information, of which he is aware at the
time he serves the notice.
(5) A person is not entitled to rely on the defence provided by subsection (3)
by reason of his reliance on information supplied by another person, unless he
shows that it was reasonable in all the circumstances for him to have relied
on the information, having regard in particular to-
(a) the steps which he took, and those which might reasonably have been
taken, for the purpose of verifying the information; and
(b) whether he had any reason to disbelieve the information. (Added 29 of
2000 s. 9)
[Index]
[Table]
[Search]
[Notes]
[Noteup]
[Previous]
[Next]
[Download (Current & Past)]
[Download (Current only)]
[繁體中文]
[Help]